Steinski.com

05/24/2007

Gonzales proposes thoughtcrime legislation

Gonzales proposes thoughtcrime legislation

Remember years ago, when you read Orwell's 1984 for the first time? There's a passage in it where O'Brien, the totalitarian thug, explains something to Winston; he points out that the easiest way to control a huge populace is to make sure that everyone is breaking a law - a society where every citizen is a criminal.

Cnet posted news of the latest brainstorm from Alberto Gonzales, who may be down but is certainly giving it the old college try. You best watch what you think.

Gonzales proposes new crime:
'Attempted' copyright infringement

...

The Bush administration is throwing its support behind a proposal called the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007, which is likely to receive the enthusiastic support of the movie and music industries, and would represent the most dramatic rewrite of copyright law since a 2005 measure dealing with prerelease piracy.
...

The IPPA would, for instance:

* Criminalize "attempting" to infringe copyright. Federal law currently punishes not-for-profit copyright infringement with between 1 and 10 years in prison, but there has to be actual infringement that takes place. The IPPA would eliminate that requirement. (The Justice Department's summary of the legislation says: "It is a general tenet of the criminal law that those who attempt to commit a crime but do not complete it are as morally culpable as those who succeed in doing so.")

* Create a new crime of life imprisonment for using pirated software. Anyone using counterfeit products who "recklessly causes or attempts to cause death" can be imprisoned for life. During a conference call, Justice Department officials gave the example of a hospital using pirated software instead of paying for it.

* Permit more wiretaps for piracy investigations. Wiretaps would be authorized for investigations of Americans who are "attempting" to infringe copyrights.

* Allow computers to be seized more readily. Specifically, property such as a PC "intended to be used in any manner" to commit a copyright crime would be subject to forfeiture, including civil asset forfeiture. Civil asset forfeiture has become popular among police agencies in drug cases as a way to gain additional revenue, and it is problematic and controversial.

* Increase penalties for violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's anticircumvention regulations. Criminal violations are currently punished by jail times of up to 10 years and fines of up to $1 million. The IPPA would add forfeiture penalties.

* Add penalties for "intended" copyright crimes. Certain copyright crimes currently require someone to commit the "distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period of at least 10 copies" valued at more than $2,500. The IPPA would insert a new prohibition: actions that were "intended to consist of" distribution.

* Require Homeland Security to alert the Recording Industry Association of America. That would happen when CDs with "unauthorized fixations of the sounds, or sounds and images, of a live musical performance" are attempted to be imported. Neither the Motion Picture Association of America nor the Business Software Alliance (nor any other copyright holder, such as photographers, playwrights or news organizations, for that matter) would qualify for this kind of special treatment.

This is a textbook example of our government being the best money can buy; corporate lawyers drafted this piece of copyright fascism, paid a lot of money to have Gonzales propose it as his own bright idea, and are paying a lot more to both parties to have this made into law. If it dies in this Congress, it will come back, and back, and back - think Dawn Of The Dead in Brooks Brothers suits, with Ivy League law degrees.

Send to Friend

Your Info

Friend Info

Back to list